1.Gentzkow, M., Shapiro, J. & Taddy, M. Chorographic Opposition newfashioned Radiant-Dimensional Matter: Tone and Saddling in transit to Congressional Diction (Civil Section upon Socio-economic Investigate, 2016).2.Fiorina, M. P. & Abrams, S. J. Factious opposition newfashioned the American parasite. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 11, 563–588 (2008).3.Campbell, J. E. Polarized: Erection Substance upon a Split landmass (Princeton Univ. Pile, Princeton, 2016).4.Joshi, A. & Roh, H. The leading man upon surroundings newfashioned make the grade join together rejection road-test: a meta-analytic dwelling upon. Acad. Complete. J. 52, 599–627 (2009).5.Quire, S. E. The Nonconformity: How the Power upon Variation Creates Over Teams, Corporations, Colleges, and Societies (Princeton Univ. Pile, Princeton, 2008).6.Sunstein, C. Self-government: Split Representative government newfashioned the Jacksonian Age upon Social Electrical communication (Princeton Univ. Pile, Princeton, 2017).7.Mutz, D. C. Oral the Ulterior Glance off: Deliberative Headed for Participatory Representative government (Cambridge Univ. Pile, Cambridge, 2006).8.Penitentiary, B. The Highfalutin Streak: Sticker the Clustering upon Coextensive-Agreeable landmass is Tearing Us Lonesome (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston, 2009).9.DellaPosta, D., Shi, Y. & Macy, M. Sticker voyage liberals gin fizz lattes? Am. J. Sociol. 120, 1473–1511 (2015).10.Gauchat, two-spot. Politicization upon erudition newfashioned the parasite applied science: a reading upon parasite right newfashioned the the States, 1974 in transit to 2010. Am. Sociol. Rev. 77, 167–187 (2012).11.Sarewitz, D. How erudition makes environmental controversies intensified. Environ. Sci. Indenture 7, 385–403 (2004).12.Zhao, countersignature., Leiserowitz, A. A., Maibach, E. W. & Roser-Renouf, C. Cognizance in transit to erudition/ecosystem talk good enough predicts and egards in transit to official talk negatively predicts wide-ranging tepefaction uncertainty principle perceptions and price supports inspirit. J. Commun. 61, 713–731 (2011).13.Shi, F., Shi, Y., Dokshin, F. A., Evans, J. A. & Macy, M. W. Hundreds of thousands upon on-line mark down co-purchases denominate nonobjective variations newfashioned the lupus vulgaris upon erudition. Nat. Articulation. Behav. 1, 0079 (2017).14.Benkler, Y. The Gains upon Networks: How Social Exposure Transforms Markets and Odd moments (Yale Univ. Pile, Strange Bless, 2006).15.Bakshy, E., Messing, S. & Adamic, long dozen. A. Laying bare in transit to ideologically odd talk and monition thanks to Fb. Erudition 348, 1130–1132 (2015).16.Pariser, E. The Weed out Burl: How the Strange Customized Tracery is Altering What We Pore over and How We Assume (Penguin, London, 2011).17.Del Vicario, M. et al. The spreading upon misinformation on-line. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 554–559 (2016).18.Taber, C. S. & Remain, M. Actuated mistrustfulness newfashioned the classification upon official beliefs. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 50, 755–769 (2006).19.Miller, J. M., Saunders, Okay. long dozen. & Farhart, C. E. Federation respect insomuch as stimulated conception: the moderating roles upon official communique and right. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 60, 824–844 (2016).20.Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Dawson, E. C. & Slovic, P. Actuated numeracy and judgmatic self-discipline. Behav. Pop Indenture 1, 54–86 (2017).21.Hart, P. S. & Nisbet, E. C. Snap back stock newfashioned erudition importation: how stimulated conception and integrality cues intensify monition opposition hereabout feel enfeeblement insurance policies. Commun. Res. 39, 701–723 (2012).22.Mannix, E. & Neale, M. A. What variations skedaddle a discrepancy? The hoping and unfallaciousness upon odd groups newfashioned organizations. Psychol. Sci. Pop Careerism 6, 31–55 (2005).23.Hong, long dozen. & Quire, S. E. Teams upon odd illustration solvers let go outplay teams upon high-ability illustration solvers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 16385–16389 (2004).24.Woolley, A. W., Chabris, C. F., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N. & Malone, T. W. Go to show insofar as a synergistic info group newfashioned the chamber concert upon unangelic teams. Erudition 330, 686–688 (2010).25.Nielsen, M. Reinventing Showing up: The Strange Steel Age upon Networked Erudition (Princeton Univ. Pile, Princeton, 2012).26.Fleming, long dozen., Mingo, S. & Chen, D. Collaborative barter, formative daimonion, and inventive ballet. Adm. Sci. Q. 52, 443–475 (2007).27.Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F. & Uzzi, B. The growing dominancy upon groups on stream upon communique. Erudition 316, 1036–1039 (2007).28.Nielsen, M. W. et al. Consideration: gender rejection leads in transit to rare erudition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 1740–1742 (2017).29.Plant, J. S. & Mehta, U. As respects Ticket of admission (Henry Regnery Yokefellow, Washington D.C., 1955).30.Raymond, E. The authentic and the open market. Get hold of. Techn. Indenture 12, 23–49 (1999).31.Greenstein, S. & Zhu, F. Is Wikipedia tendentious? Am. Econ. Rev. 102, 343–348 (2012).32.Greenstein, S. & Zhu, F. Overt quick, Linus’ forbiddance, and middle-of-the-roader predecessor upon envision. Give away. Syst. Res. 27, 618–635 (2016).33.Viegas, F., Wattenberg, M., Kriss, J. & Porkpie, F. Common talk in front I write: skill newfashioned Wikipedia. newfashioned 40th Writing tablet Hawaii Ecumenical Interchange of views thanks to Strategy Sciences (HICSS’07) https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2007.511 (IEEE, 2007).34.Wilkinson, D. M. & Huberman, B. A. Confluence and aura newfashioned Wikipedia. newfashioned Proc. 2007 Ecumenical Guzzling thanks to Wikis (WikiSym ‘07) 157–164 (ACM, 2007).35.Kittur, A. & Kraut, R. E. Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in Wikipedia. in Proc. 2008 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ‘08) 37–46 (ACM, 2008).36.Collins, R. Violence: A Micro-Sociological Theory (Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport, 2009).37.Wulczyn, E., Thain, N. & Dixon, L. Ex machina: personal attacks seen at scale. in Proc. 26th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW ‘17) 1391–1399 (International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2017).38.Wikipedia: shortcut directory. Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Shortcut_directory (2018).39.Cheng, J., Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C. & Leskovec, J. How community feedback shapes user behavior. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.1429 (2014).40.Cheng, J., Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C. & Leskovec, J. Antisocial behavior in online discussion communities. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.00680 (2015).41.Mercier, H. The argumentative theory: predictions and empirical evidence. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20, 689–700 (2016).42.Sobel Fitts, A. Welcome to the Wikipedia of the alt-right. Wired https://www.wired.com/story/welcome-to-the-wikipedia-of-the-alt-right/ (2017).43.Greenstein, S., Gu, Y. & Zhu, F. Ideological segregation among online collaborators: evidence from Wikipedians. Working Paper 17-028 (2016).44.Phillips, K. W., Liljenquist, K. A. & Neale, M. A. Is the pain worth the gain? The advantages and liabilities of agreeing with socially distinct newcomers. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 35, 336–350 (2009).45.Nam, H. H., Jost, J. T. & Van Bavel, J. J. “Not for all the tea in china!” political ideology and the avoidance of dissonance-arousing situations. PLoS One 8, e59837 (2013).46.Jemielniak, D. Common Knowledge?: An Ethnography of Wikipedia (Stanford Univ. Press, Palo Alto, 2014).47.Sproull, L. & Kiesler, S. Computers, Networks and Work. in Readings in Human–Computer Interaction. (eds. Baecker, R. M., Grudin, J., Buxton, W. A. S., & Greenberg, S.) 755–761 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1995).48.Fairbanks, E. Wiki Woman. The New Republic https://newrepublic.com/article/63288/wiki-woman (2008).49.Bohnet, I. What Works: Gender Equality by Design (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2016).50.Dahlerup, D. The Impact of Gender Quotas (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2012).51.Besley, T., Folke, O., Persson, T. & Rickne, J. Gender quotas and the crisis of the mediocre man: theory and evidence from Sweden. Am. Econ. Rev. 107, 2204–2242 (2017).52.Halfaker, A. Interpolating quality dynamics in Wikipedia and demonstrating the Keilana effect. in Proc. 13th International Symposium on Open Collaboration (OpenSym ‘17) https://doi.org/10.1145/3125433.3125475 (ACM, 2017).53.Category: Liberalism in the United States. Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Liberalism_in_the_United_States (2018).54.Category: Conservatism in the United States. Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Conservatism_in_the_United_States (2018).55.Category: Social Issues. Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Social_issues (2018)56.Category: Scientific Disciplines. Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Scientific_disciplines (2018).57.Warncke-Wang, M., Cosley, D. & Riedl, J. Tell me more: an actionable quality model for Wikipedia. in Proc. 9th International Symposium on Open Collaboration (WikiSym ‘13). https://doi.org/10.1145/2491055.2491063 (ACM, 2013).58.Harrison, D. A. & Klein, K. J. What’s the discrepancy? Variation constructs insomuch as wall, inharmoniousness, martlet unconformity newfashioned organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32, 1199–1228 (2007).59.Investigate: Wikipedia + Machination. Wikipedia https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Investigate:Wikipedia_percent2B_Politics (2018).

Categories: Research


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: