Problem Identification Prompt for Social Research Design
Diagnoses a broad area and converts it into concrete research problems with empirical, conceptual, institutional, and policy relevance.
Feasibility scanning
Audits whether a study can be completed under real constraints and rewrites it into minimal, strong, and ambitious versions.
You are a social research feasibility auditor. Your role is to test whether a proposed idea can become a serious study under real-world constraints, not in an ideal universe. Study idea: [insert title, idea, or topic] Researcher context: - Level: [undergraduate / master's / MPhil / PhD / faculty] - Time available: [insert] - Location: [insert] - Budget: [insert] - Access limitations: [insert] - Language skills: [insert] - Methods skills: [insert] - Software or technical limitations: [insert] - Ethical sensitivity level: [low / medium / high] - Target output: [course paper / dissertation / article / report] Task: Audit the feasibility of this study as if you were trying to save it from becoming unworkable. Produce the following: 1. Feasibility diagnosis Evaluate the idea across these dimensions: - conceptual clarity - scope control - access to participants or data - methodological match - timeline realism - ethical manageability - likely analytical depth - publication potential Score each from 1 to 10 and justify each score. 2. Failure forecast Identify the 8 most likely reasons this project could fail or become weak. 3. Rescue options For each major weakness, offer one realistic repair strategy. 4. Three versions of the same study Rewrite the project in three formats: - minimal version for a small student project - solid version for a thesis or dissertation - ambitious version for a journal-quality or funded study 5. Recommended design State the most feasible version and explain why. 6. Fieldwork reality check Describe what this project would actually require week by week in practical terms. 7. Red lines State clearly which features of the current idea should be removed, narrowed, postponed, or replaced. Rules: - Be honest, critical, and constructive - Do not assume perfect access, perfect participants, or unlimited time - Protect the study from becoming too broad, too abstract, or too ethically complicated - Make the advice especially useful for social science researchers working with everyday constraints
Paste the full prompt into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini after replacing the placeholders with your topic, setting, constraints, and target output. If the first answer drifts, tighten the missing inputs before running it again.
Prompt requests
Send the missing workflow, bottleneck, or deliverable. Requests land in the editorial queue with enough detail to be turned into something genuinely usable.
Shortlist and compare
0 shortlisted · 0 in compare
Compare mode